October Weekend in Bristol

Bristol is one of those Rhode Island towns that rewards going slowly. It’s a half-hour from Providence on Route 114 through Barrington and Warren, a drive that is itself worth taking in October when the trees along the road are doing what October trees in Rhode Island do. The destination is almost secondary.

The town itself sits on a narrow peninsula between Narragansett Bay and the Mount Hope Bay, which means that water is present in most directions most of the time. The harbor is working and recreational in roughly equal measure. The main street has the bones of a prosperous nineteenth-century shipping town — the scale is right, the buildings are mostly intact, and enough of the ground floor retail is local that it doesn’t feel entirely managed.

What I went for, this particular October, was the Coggeshall Farm Museum, which I’d been meaning to visit for years and kept not visiting. It’s a living history farm on the west shore of the peninsula, set in the late eighteenth century, operating on the agricultural calendar of that period. In October that means the harvest, which they do with period tools and period methods. It’s the kind of place that could easily tip into the precious or the performative and mostly doesn’t — the people working there seem to actually know what they’re doing and the farm itself is genuinely operational rather than decorative.

Bristol in October, before the foliage crowds have fully moved on and before the holiday season has started, is quieter than it is in summer without being empty. The restaurants are open, the harbor is still active, the walk along the waterfront path is unobstructed. It’s a good day trip from Providence. It’s a good reminder that Rhode Island, which is easy to treat as a single metro area with some coastline attached, is actually several distinct places if you bother to look.

What the General Assembly Gets Wrong About Housing

Rhode Island has a housing problem and the General Assembly has been aware of this for at least a decade. The awareness has not translated into much. The session ends, the reports are filed, the task forces complete their work and publish their findings, and the housing stock in Providence and the surrounding communities remains what it was. This is not an accident.

The structural issue is that the General Assembly is unusually responsive to the preferences of existing homeowners, which is true of most state legislatures but is especially true here, where the districts are small and the incumbent protection is thorough and the people who show up to testify at hearings are overwhelmingly people who already own property and have strong opinions about what gets built near it.

The practical result is that Rhode Island does zoning reform the way it does most things: partially, slowly, and in ways that allow communities to opt out of the parts that would actually change anything. The legislation passes with the teeth removed and everyone involved can say they addressed the problem.

I’m not a housing policy specialist and this is not a policy brief. What I am is someone who has lived in Providence for a long time and watched a city that was genuinely affordable when I arrived become significantly less so, and watched the political system that is supposed to address this treat it as a communication problem rather than a supply problem. The General Assembly knows what the research says. The question is whether the people in it have the incentives to act on it. The answer, so far, is no.

That may change. The demographics of who owns property and who rents in Rhode Island are shifting, and the political coalition that has kept zoning reform bottled up is not permanent. But it hasn’t changed yet, and the people who need housing now are not well served by optimism about the medium term.